After discussion, we've decided to ACCEPT this appeal. However, you are considered on probation, lasting one month, (21st June - 21st July). Any rulebreaks committed in this period will result in you being permanently banned once more. You are also expected to have a decent amount of activity...

Hi, I will be handling this appeal. There's a question I'd like to pose, first. So, this is your tracked playtime on the server, starting from the 6th of December. Prior to this, back in November, you managed to accrue two warnings in one day, one for spamming voice commands, and the other...

She witnessed it while on server, but djd not act on it then. There was debate in staff channels over whether it was enough to be a ban, which she then decided on later.

Not really, don't remember the scenario. I just banned on Neonity's behalf due to her being unable to get on the server. She was the one who witnessed his rulebreak and askes dor him to be banned after discussion in staff chat.

Hello. I am the Rank Leader that was at the head of the sweep. As you were told, the crate that you broke into in the hardpoint had a biolock, and the emote made in response to yours mentioned the biolock flashing red. This was an alert to Civil Protection that a biolock had failed. They moved...

I've already stated my case, and have nothing further to add to this.

It's a verbal warning. You misused the command in the middle of a large event with multiple players around, knowing that it was not the right thing to do. When handling administrative actions, we take into account the severity of what was done regarding warnings, so you don't have to assume that...

it's cringe

ugh

Phoenix hit the nail on the head. This warning is more than justified. The fact that you then took it to a public complaint to try and besmirch Flerk over it is appalling. Incredibly petty.

I like this. It's a good way for loyalists / citizens to get engaged in expeditions without having to be a rebel. And maybe rebels could infiltrate an expedition along the way to smuggle back items. This is good.

What relevance does that have? It's still their choice if they would have agreed to void it or not, and I don't believe they would have.

You don't make the decision on what is voided and what is not voided. It requires the consent of all parties involved, and you did not have it.

Some of the logs, including him throwing himself from the building as well as throwing his character at people with /charfallover, all of which was witnessed by myself and Maroon. In addition, you were also taken into the CMU to be treated after you threw yourself from the roof. You then...

Even outside of the connotations of the name Rothschild, you also had "III" added to your name, which is in itself a breach of our character naming rules. I think your intent was pretty clear here, and I see no reason to restore your previous name. I fully agree with Noh's decision.

the balancing changes includes making it not do easy to get them too

not in favour of a character wipe, but in favour of an item wipe for rebels once the balancing changes are made- maybe not a total wipe, but definitely getting rid of the OP guns

you do know that CPs have actual development right

i can't wait for this one to be executed too why does she have crow as a nickname, does anyone even call her that...

It seems that you may have gotten confused with another person. You disconnected very shortly after someone completely vanished from the server right after being chased by CPs. Due to a bug, I was unable to check the description of your character to verify, but the timestamps matched up. Due to...