At this point there's no use arguing about picky points. Faction Leads have likely read this, and will do their best to correct for misbehaviour and guide the faction along the lines that they want to portray.
Another thing to note is the blurred line between OOC and IC and how much these 2 affect each other. If unserious, or for any matter quotes that may be serious but are taken out of context and thus viewed unseriously, are circulated and starboarded, the OOC outlook of the playerbase toward that...
I think one of the main catalysts of this silliness is the announcement of V3. People don't see a reason to take the server seriously anymore because the end is nigh, so they eke as much low-hanging fun as they can.
The issues with bans is that it's subjective. There's no hard-and-fast criteria for discriminating silliness from failRP. And frankly, the recent incident in August where 2 players were banned suddenly and publicly for something rather innocuous, was overzealous, and uncalled for. This should...
We've detected and analysed the symptoms. Now the question is: how do we fix it?
Civpro faction leads have the power to crack down on this sort of behaviour, both through IC and OOC means. A moderate, light-handed approach should be taken though, as oftentimes reactionary measures can cause...
When you extend the limit you encourage people to talk in LOOC more. // in IC chat being uncomfortable is a good thing, as it deters you from speaking OOC'ly in the first place. The current system is good
Sorry... can we just talk about this? This is completely tangential but I'm having a crashout moment. I'm seeing this more and more in HL2RP: the overuse of the word 'within' even in contexts where it's neither necessary nor does it add any further value in place of simply using the word 'in'...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.