My only real issue is that GMs actively influenced IC decisions through an OOC medium, aside from this it was played by the book.
The main comaint was 'non-characters' were sweeping, now you have actual characters sweeping.
You can't claim we 'didn't strike a blow to the resistance' when said individuals on the boat were armed to the teeth. You can't plead safety and room to passive roleplay outside of the Combine's grip while sitting on a boat with M16s and full-armor.
It probably wasn't the smartest idea to put the RP-hub in a highly illegal area, doubled when all those who are 'passive roleplaying' tend to sit in full equipment. I don't believe it's fair to plead safety of Passive RP when you take these factors into account- why didn't you put it in the slums?
I've already responded to the complaint thread, I'm now responding to the replies levied against me-- you're quite literally the only one ragebaiting at this point.
>come into general channel to ragebait
>surprised that it's frustrating when you do so
tuki respectfully, you didn't choose to make a complaint, you chose to go into a public channel and start tossing allegations. stop trying to take the high ground like you're a saint.
they aren't always armed, they aren't always together. you want these responses to stop? police your side, stop them from being blatantly bombastic in their actions. I won't apologise for enforcing the setting, the Combine are the overlords, not the rebels.
APF unit
@Wraygun was being silly, he has admitted he was getting carried away. I'll let him speak for himself. APF laughing is on-character, so I won't police that.
sounds familiar.
frankly when the ET lead says I'm 'off the rails' and 'hopes my lead role gets taken away' and then...
You're quite literally making up rubbish, I can assure you nobody has 'targeted' you nor particularly cares. You were removed from an unofficial, private discord because you were attempting to cause members of it problems by leaking out-of-context messages to another Willard community member...
If you aren't going to post evidence of the homophobia and racism I suggest you stop posting on this complaint thread, otherwise I'm going to take it as a blatant attempt to cause drama which violates the rule of 'being a dick' which is rule #1 of our community. The onus of proof is on you, not...
It did very much confuse me that CPs would even risk sweeping for such a low-tier loss of what is supposed to be a throwaway force, but I was on the receiving-end of such actions, so I can't exactly make a fuss as one of the leads.
Wow that sounds like a rebel-mentality issue, no safe-zone that can't be touched by the occupying forces? We don't log on unless we want to perform a shotcop! Good roleplay, good roleplay!
The Bunker wasn't fair because any Tom, Dick and Harry could AFK in it all day. The shadow-sweep (which the 'losing trust' referred to) was fair, for reasons that have already been stated in a denied PK appeal. This dramatized stance is tiring, at this stage.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.