- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
- Messages
- 894
"It was an attack on the dangers posed by both communism and fascism – and the strength of his argument in Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it could apply to a range of totalitarian systems. Orwell died in January 1950, just seven months after the novel was published."Of course, but in portrayals / caricatures of communism, those are traditionally the aspects explored
Like in that one book
Nineteen Eighty-Four is an allegory to totalitarianism, not communism specifically. Orwell himself was a devoted socialist, who on innumerable occasions volunteered or attempted to volunteer to fight against fascist-aligned forces, even alongside Communist and Soviet ones. He tried to enlist for World War II but was declared unfit for service due to pre-existing medical reasons, likely from the time he was shot in the neck during the Spanish Civil War.
Saying Nineteen Eighty-Four is a portrayal of Communism is only one side of the book. Orwell, in spite of his dislike for Bolshevism, was more concerned with the advent of totalitarian systems in general, and while he has made books that serve as a more direct condemnation of the Soviet system of governance (Animal Farm), it's important to note that Orwell lived through a time that included the likes of World War II and fascist Germany, Italy, and Spain, the latter most he fought. Bolshevism was a primary inspiration, but it wasn't a polemic exclusive to the dreg of Bolshevism. In Orwell's time, Fascism died while Bolshevism survived, so we retroactively alter and misattribute what may be perceived as a criticism of fascism or totalitarianism to that of Communism because it is more relatable to our scope of time.
Also, those aspects are usually explored in Fascism too; — see Warhammer, Farcry 6, Wolfenstein, et cetera.

