Denied VCs for OTA classes

[caedes]

Add VCs for Ordinals and Supressors.

 

[Steel]

Yes, scare the shit out of civies.

 

[Robert]

I said in the past that class separate VCs will not be done. At most all OTA will share the same voicelines, maybe some time far into the future, but as of right now this is 100% a no from me.

 

[verTix]

I said in the past that class separate VCs will not be done. At most all OTA will share the same voicelines, maybe some time far into the future, but as of right now this is 100% a no from me.

It's a lot of tedious effort and I don't blame you for wanting to avoid it. It's probably well over a thousand full sentences worth of audio files and words that you'd have to correlate.

I'd be willing to help if you ever get the urge to start this up again.

 

[Steel]

It's a lot of tedious effort and I don't blame you for wanting to avoid it. It's probably well over a thousand full sentences worth of audio files and words that you'd have to correlate.

I'd be willing to help if you ever get the urge to start this up again.

It'd be nice to hear actual VC's being correctly used. Especially for OTA.

 

[The Milkman]

As nice as it would be, I very much doubt the devs would prioritize this near-useless addition over anything else, since I'm sure that would be hell to code in

 

[Rebel RP Philosopher]

It's a lot of tedious effort and I don't blame you for wanting to avoid it. It's probably well over a thousand full sentences worth of audio files and words that you'd have to correlate.

I'd be willing to help if you ever get the urge to start this up again.

Anyone can literally make a list of VCs. The developers should not be the ones doing it as it is as you mention "tedious effort".

Once defined, the file can be sent to a developer for review who could finish it by defining for class use.

 

[Atle]

DENIED