Pawlu's ban appeal

[Pawlu]

Steam Name:
Pawlu

SteamID:
STEAM_0:0:525144524


Name of the Admin you were banned by:
Leudoberct

How long is the ban for?:
Permaban

The reason you were banned?:
Basically, I had gotten banned for basically throwing myself from the 4th floor of the RDT, I was streaming it.

Why do you wish to be unbanned?:
I'll be fair, the whole thing was mostly to get out a laugh from the people in VC. It was a stunt, I had gotten pressured to do it and I knew I would get probably in trouble for it. I'd say I would be deserving of the punishment of some kind, however, a permanent ban is in my opinion too harsh for minging for a couple of minutes, I believe I'm a dedicated player who acts seriously during actual roleplay, however, the actions of a few minutes basically dictate anything. I'm certain others in the community have likely messed around with OOC in-game but not meet serious repercussions because, in the end, all parties agreed to void this issue. The same could be done here, I acknowledge my mistake over a dumb stunt, and I take my punishment (preferably 1-3 days) however every party agrees to void this whole issue and move on.

Do you have any picture or video evidence to support your reason?:
(the video is from Official_KP's perspective)

https://easyupload.io/32ch6k

Were there any witnesses who can help in this appeal?: (List the steam and/or character names of them or tag them)
Well, there were multiple people watching me do the whole thing but the person who recorded the whole thing from their perspective was @Official_KP

 

[Leudoberct]

Some of the logs, including him throwing himself from the building as well as throwing his character at people with /charfallover, all of which was witnessed by myself and Maroon.

In addition, you were also taken into the CMU to be treated after you threw yourself from the roof. You then behaved like this while in treatment.

As for your claim about all parties agreeing to a void:

 

[Pawlu]

As for your claim about all parties agreeing to a void:

I was going to speak in LOOC to clarify that this was all to be voided but I ended up getting banned before I could say anything

 

[Leudoberct]

You don't make the decision on what is voided and what is not voided. It requires the consent of all parties involved, and you did not have it.

 

[Pawlu]

You don't make the decision on what is voided and what is not voided. It requires the consent of all parties involved, and you did not have it.

My point is, I was gonna say in LOOC to agree to void it

 

[Leudoberct]

What relevance does that have? It's still their choice if they would have agreed to void it or not, and I don't believe they would have.

 

[Neonity]

Based on the evidence provided by other staff, I see it fit to deny this appeal for the time being.

You are free to appeal again in one month.