/SetFacialExpression

[𝔄𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔮]

IE You might not like to want to or have a poker face like this when you're threatening someone.

Or when you're crying, whatever the circumstance may be I'd like them facial expressions.

 

[vilhjalmrf]

Wear a mask. Easy.

 

[𝔄𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔮]

Wear a mask. Easy.

And what if you're a loyalist or in the city?

 

[Deleted member 2717]

Is expressing your character's emotion not the entire purpose of /me's? God forbid a roleplayer has to use their imagination at any point during their gameplay ig.

 

[𝔄𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔮]

Is expressing your character's emotion not the entire purpose of /me's? God forbid a roleplayer has to use their imagination at any point during their gameplay ig.

Its a bit more for the sake of if your character has a resting bitch face that its actually on show or such, rather than not having to roleplay what look you're giving. That and once someone does /me angry face they can set their facial expression to angry. A nice touch I'd say.

 

[Aspect™]

Is expressing your character's emotion not the entire purpose of /me's? God forbid a roleplayer has to use their imagination at any point during their gameplay ig.

So true
Next up we'll have

 

[𝔄𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔮]

That is exactly what i replied to for counter point sake @Aspect™

 

[Ruairidh]

Is expressing your character's emotion not the entire purpose of /me's? God forbid a roleplayer has to use their imagination at any point during their gameplay ig.

True!

 

[Aspect™]

Denied.

We feel like this would be a bit too flimsy to work with, as we'd need to make specific facial expressions for people, and seeing characters walking around with static smiles or frowns or such would look quite silly. Not to mention, of course, that you can always roleplay this - considering it is one of the basic things that the /me command is meant for; that is to express your character's emotions and physical appearance.