This meme is racist because it's mocking a racist attack that claimed the life of an african american man, it was the boiling point in which White Supremacy in America caused a racial minority to be brutalised by the police for a reason that did not warrant it whatsoever. It sparked the Black Lives Matter movement, a social cause that angled against white supremacy and police brutality in america. Even members of our own community on this thread can see why making a meme like this isn't just objectionable but obscene. This is is a screenshot from a video in which a black man is, in a racially motivated act of violence, strangled to death on the sidewalk edited to look like a funny minion meme. It's abhorrent.
At no point did I begin going on a rant about the events surrounding George Floyd. I never said anything about George Floyd's position. You are pointing at a meme (on tenor gifs) that was posted completely out of the context surrounding it and are now adding on all the baggage around it.
This meme is transphobic because it involves a soyjak-ified version of a trans woman with ones features accentuated to look male (jowls, balding hair). The subject of this photo is Kathryn Gibes, a woman who has been the target of harassment from a variety of internet cesspits from lolcow sites to kiwifarms. literally just google "kathryn gibes" and scroll down past the first few links and you'll come across the most abhorrent transphobia and homophobia you've seen recently (Well, I know *you* won't since you almost certainly hang out there often anyways)
Again, same as before. I didn't even know who this person was, and anyone else who was in the same position would just assume that it was a mark at their appearance. This is once again seeing through your own perspective in a manner that holds a political bias to defend something that otherwise would not be of note.
This meme is anti-semitic because it features 'The Happy Merchant', a charicature originating from the chan boards. You're more than welcome to learn up on this charicature's antisemitic history from the anti-defamation league, but in essence it emphasizes traits antisemites typically associate with jewish people in an attempt to incite racial hatred -
https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/happy-merchant
I admitted that this would be anti-semitic. It was the one warning here that I understood, and I said that in this report.
It's because you had already directly messaged one of the trans members of the community who's under constant targeted harassment by Pepper asking what they thought of Encyclopedia Dramatica.
I am not on the staff team. I am not predisposed to knowing the drama surrounding someone, especially from Dr. Pepper, who is notorious for taking extra steps to be hidden. I still don't understand how asking someone "What do you think of Encyclopedia Dramatica" in a public chat
(this was not in their DMs, this was in a public chat. I don't know why you included that.) is somehow transphobia at all, in the slightest.
At the time of messaging them, this was prominently displayed as the page for 'Transgender'
Go look up "Heterosexual" on Encyclopedia Dramatica. Go look up White People or "White Devils". Look up "Capitalism". Hell, just start looking up anything opposed to YOUR beliefs since you specifically want to cherry pick shit to support your argument. Encyclopedia Dramatica rips on literally everything and is meant to piss off everyone. So unless Encyclopedia Dramatica is suddenly a slur and yet another example of "hate speech" in your constantly, rapidly evolving dictionary of "things I dont like," then I don't understand why I'm being labelled as a transphobe for literally just mentioning it and nothing else.
We had more than enough reason to believe that you saying 'im about to get transphobic' wasn't a joke.
And yet you could see for hours and hours afterwards that nothing occurred.
Before the responses to this report came in, I was of the opinon that it was just a basic bias of simple beliefs. I was willing to assume that this was just an accidental over reaction. That's not the case anymore. It's readily apparent and plain as day that members of staff have a strangehold over what is and isn't allowed to be said. You saying "we're eliminating
bigotry and
hate" doesn't change it from what it is: Showing extremely political and divisive bias and using charged labels and words to raise an emotional response and trap people into agreeing with you, lest they also be labelled as "bigots." I'm not falling for it. I'd hope that no one else would either.