Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Notices A RESPONSE TO CALLAWAY'S RESPONSE

Kamilisha Haijulikani

Tenzhen CEO
ENG
Protector
Gamemaster
Staff Team
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Messages
894


98%.png

98%.png
New line 3 (1).png

A FIRM, DECISIVE REBUTTAL TO CALLAWAY'S LIES.
A RESPONSE TO CALLAWAY'S RESPONSE.


C24 - Gov Logo (1).png


WE ARE AWARE OF CALLAWAY'S RESPONSE. WE BELIEVE IT IS MANIPULATIVE, FICTITIOUS, AND WRONG.

STILL, ACTIONS SHOW CALLAWAY IS AN UNLOYAL DICTATOR.

IF POLITICAL FREEDOMS ARE TO BE RESTORED TO THE SECURITY COUNCIL, THEN HE MUST BE REMOVED.

HE WILL LABEL US TERRORISTS, DISSIDENTS, TRAITORS, AND A FABRICATION, BUT THESE ARE SIMPLE FALLACIES MEANT TO DETRACT FROM OUR WORDS AND AVOID ANY GENUINE RESPONSE. THAT IS, SIMPLE STRAWMANS.

WE THEREFORE MAINTAIN OUR PETITION AND CALL UPON THE CITY ADMINISTRATORS TO IMPLEMENT THE FOUR POINTS OF REFORM.

SIGNED,
THE NEO-CONSTRUCTIVISTS.

Orwell And Valente Glory! 2 (1).png






Claim #1 - Breaking Security Council Law

This is false; no law has been broken within the guidelines of the Security Council. Laws are democratically voted on, and people are allowed to voice their opinion whichever way. In fact, I myself PASSED a decree to formally SHUN and CONDEMN attempts to intimidate fellow members during voting. See CH-WC-06: Chairman's Authority line 5.

THE ASCENSIONISTS VOTED TO END DEMOCRACY IN AN ASCENSIONIST-RIGGED VOTE. ONCE AGAIN, WE MUST REITERATE, THIS IS ILLEGAL PER SECURITY COUNCIL LAW, LAW WHICH THE CHAIRPERSON DELIBERATELY SOUGHT TO MANIPULATE, DISBAND, AND DESTROY, BUT REMAINS ENSCRIBED IN CHARTER.

NO MATTER HOW MUCH CALLAWAY MAY ARGUE, HIS POSITION DOES NOT GRANT HIM THE AUTHORITY TO AMEND OUR CHARTER. HE CLAIMS HIMSELF SUBSERVIENT TO COUNCIL DEMOCRACY, BUT HAS DISSOLVED ELECTIONS THEMSELVES.

MOREOVER, IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE ISSUANCE OF A UNILATERAL DECREE BY THE CHAIRPERSON—THE SAME DECREES USED TO BAN THE HYPER-REPUBLICANS AND UNBAN GLOBALLY-BANNED FUTURISM AND BREENISM— IS COUNTERINTUITIVE TO YOUR CLAIM OF "DEMOCRACY."

TO USE THAT AS "PROOF" OF YOUR GOODWILL WHEN IT DISPELS YOUR CLAIMS COMPLETELY IS LUDICROUS.

CLEAR HYPOCRISY.

ADDITIONALLY, AT NO POINT DO YOU ADDRESS THE MAIN POINT OF CRITICISM, WHICH IS DISSOLVING ELECTIONS AND INSTITUTING AN ASCENSIONIST-LED DICTATORSHIP NEAR THE END OF YOUR TERM.


Claim #2 - Purging Members
I undertook wide-scale reforms to reinvigorate the party. When I first became Chairman, there was relatively little, if any, willingness to participate in the political mechanisms.

In order to rectify this, we had to eliminate what we termed lazy loyalists. Of which, there were many people who sat behind a shop counter and called it loyalism and refused to participate in the inner-workings of the political scene.

Furthermore, this claim that I somehow destroyed the Civil Workers Party is utter nonsense. If I wanted to destroy it, I would’ve had its foremost theorist, Varos Atkins, kicked out of the party. The Civil Workers Party was an utter mess. I issued a warning, if anything, to get its act together. I actually intended to try and revive the party by urging them to back themselves up under Ascensionist policies, which it never did, and the binder fizzled out on its own.

"Back themselves up under Ascensionist policies." BEFORE YOUR PURGES, THE CIVIL WORKERS' PARTY WAS THE LARGEST AND MOST ACTIVE BINDER IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL. YOU ALSO CLAIM "LITTLE WILLINGNESS" TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL MECHANISMS WHEN, BEFORE YOUR TERM, DOZENS OF COLLABORATORS ATTENDED OUR SECURITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, WHEREAS YOU HAVE ON RECORD THREE.

YOU ALSO MISREPRESENT THE PURGES AS "REFORMS," DENYING THE PURGES' TRUE MOTIVE DESPITE USING THESE REFORMS TO CONSOLIDATE POWER, PROMOTE ASCENSIONISM, REMOVE THE OPPOSITION, AND COERCE EXISTING BINDERS TO ALIGN WITH ASCENSIONISM, SUCH AS YOUR MENTIONED THREAT TOWARDS THE CWP.

FURTHERMORE, IN THE AFTERMATH OF THESE PURGES, WHEN THE CIVIL WORKERS' PARTY WENT FROM DOZENS OF MEMBERS TO ONE— VAROS ATKINS—, YOU PROMOTED ASCENSIONISTS CRONIES LIKE WIM DOCHT, ELSA BECKER, AND TROY HENRY HARDWICK TO QUICKLY MONOPOLIZE POWER OVER THE COLLABORATORS' PARTY WITH MANUFACTURED ASCENSIONIST-MAJORITY.

YOUR PURGE, SUBSEQUENT LAWS— LIKE THE LABOUR-POLITICAL NEUTRALITY ACT—, AND THE HOSTILE CLIMATE YOU HAVE CREATED, AS WELL AS THE CREATION OF THE UNITY TRIBUNAL, WHICH, BY ADMISSION, WAS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RESTRICTING NON-ASCENSIONIST APPOINTEES, HAVE CULMINATED IN THEIR METHODICAL DISSOLUTION.


Claim #3 - Repression of Political Thought/The Hyper-Republican Ban

Up until this point, I mistook this criticism as a fair-minded one coming from an honest loyalist perspective until they revealed their true loyalties. They criticise the Hyper-Republican ban, a party which, by the time I was Chairman, was already dead in the water and was riddled with criminals. Hyper-Republicanism grew to be a call for the French rebels in City 13. If we wish to so blatantly promote them, by all means, but you can only do so through the bars of a prison cell.

This individual wants to sit here and lecture ME about the disproven claim that the Metadynamists murdered the darling of the Hyper-Republican movement. This is the same Administration that, under the rat-traitor Chevalier, Rajko, and undercover Resistance sympathiser Emiyo Marcum, MURDERED Shlomo Peretz and Leonard Pallas Reiter. You want to sit here and lecture me on political violence when I outlawed the worst perpetrator of it. Where were you when the Hyper-Republicans BANNED the Metadynamists and promoted their liberal members through the ranks of the party?

YOU HAVE CONSISTENTLY CALLED FOR THE DEATH AND BULLYING OF POLITICAL OPPONENTS AND PEOPLE YOU PERCEIVED AS TRAITORS TO YOUR CAUSE. YOUR ATTITUDE HERE, AND USE OF DISINGENUOUS RHETORIC, IS BLATANT TWO-FACED BEHAVIOUR, PERFORMATIVE, AND HIGHLIGHTS YOUR GENUINE VULNERABILITY.

ADDITIONALLY, THE CLAIMS THAT THE METADYNAMIST-ASSASSINATIONS WERE "DISPROVEN" ARE BLATANTLY FALSE AND PROPAGANDIZED BY THE CALLAWAY ADMINISTRATION TO JUSTIFY THEIR CONTINUED PERSECUTION OF FRENCH CULTURE, THEIR ALLIANCE WITH THE METADYNAMIST-FUTURISTS, AND THE CONTINUED BLAMING OF HYPER-REPUBLICANS LIBERALS FOR THEIR WOES.


Claim #4 - The Unity Tribunal is an Ascensionist Machine

This is disproven by the fact that the Unity Tribunal has approved both Ascensionist and non-Ascensionist party members. The Devotionist Union was a binder that ran in direct opposition to us, and we allowed it to operate freely. Indeed, we approved multiple members of their own binder into the party.

The Unity Tribunal has neither targeted non-ascensionist party members like Stephanie Roberts nor Varos Atkins. If I intended to use it to hound my enemies, I certainly could, but have I? The Unity Tribunal guards the party and filters through counter-collaborators who may try to engage in subterfuge or party members coming under suspicion.

"With no proper opposition in reality, we should seize this opportunity to make ourselves the sole arbiter of loyalism, we become the Security Council. We aim to provoke our enemies, hidden and public, inside the party and snuff them out. This also includes the Unity Tribunal, the system designed to promote and demote those in the party. It must be firmly under our control to ensure every new member is within our binder."
Chapter Two, The Enlightened Revolution.
ARE WE TO ASSUME THAT CALLAWAY'S CREATION OF THE UNITY TRIBUNAL—INCLUDING HIS APPOINTMENT OF MAJORITY ASCENSIONISTS TO THE BOARD—, PUBLIC ADMISSION OF BIAS AND GATEKEEPING, AND ASCENSIONIST MAJORITY IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL ARE SIMPLE COINCIDENCES WHEN HE PUBLICLY STATES OTHERWISE?

CALLAWAY WOULD HAVE YOU FOOL YOU INTO BELIEVING THAT HIS PUBLIC ADMISSION OF BIAS ISN'T SO.

THIS IS THE SAME CALLAWAY WHO PUBLICLY ADMITS TO NEEDING TO FABRICATE ASCENSIONIST ACHIEVEMENTS TO MAINTAIN SUPPORT, STATING, "IF IT IS THE RAREST OF CASES IN WHICH THERE ARE NO ACHIEVEMENTS TO REPORT, THEN THE ACHIEVEMENT MUST BE FABRICATED."

Chapter One, The Enlightened Revolution.



Claim #5 - I Engaged in Criminal Acts, Vandalism, Violence, Intimidation and Openly Celebrated Opposition Deaths

I will break it down one by one, but I will preface this quite clearly. The Ascensionist Movement stands opposed to the militaristic mindset. Take this quote from the official Ascensionist manifesto forum. “We are not a militia but an organised political movement.” We do not engage in vandalism, criminal acts, or violence against our opposition; we never have and we never will.

"Business owners guilty of counter-revolution should be evicted or have a notice pinned on their entrance notifying all of their guilt. Anyone who chooses to shop within the establishment should also be punished."
Chapter Three, The Enlightened Revolution.

THIS EXCERPT ENCOURAGES WEAPONIZING EVICTIONS AND FINANCIALLY, AS WELL AS SOCIALLY HARMING BUSINESS OWNERS AND THEIR PATRONS FOR IDEOLOGICAL VIEWS, SLANDERING THEIR REPUTATIONS, AS WELL AS DEFACING STORE PROPERTY WITH INTIMIDATORY MESSAGES AND PUBLIC DENOUNCIATIONS.

"We will call upon all good, loyal citizens to deal with counter-revolutionaries as they see fit. Their interpretation of this is to test their loyalty. They will be blacklisted from society. Their housing will be revoked, forcing them to live in the slums. We cannot have these people walk so freely without harm befalling them; their eventual elimination is merely a consequence of the revolution."
Chapter Three, The Enlightened Revolution.

THIS IS AN INCITEMENT OF VIOLENCE. YOU IMPLICITLY AGREE TO POLITICAL VIOLENCE TO DEAL WITH SO-CALLED "COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARIES," WHO YOU DEFINE AS DISSIDENTS AND COUNTER-COLLABORATORS, TELLING ASCENSIONISTS TO DEAL WITH YOUR ENEMIES "AS THEY SEE FIT" FOR PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.


I in no way promote a cult of personality, I am the leader of a large political movement, whatever follows from that is the peoples decision. There are those even within my binder, take Marcus Cross as an example, the newly elected Consulate-General. He certainly does not worship me nor grovel at my feet; he merely shows respect to someone with whom he is politically aligned. I swore an oath of complete fealty toward the Administration of Orwell-Valente, and I have not once taken any action against them; every decision I make is in the betterment of their interests and the people of City 24, hence why they have not demanded my removal and enjoy my support.

YOUR FEALTY MEANS NOTHING WHEN YOU HAVE PUBLICLY DENIGRATED THE NAME OF OUR CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO MERE "RELEVANCE" FOR YOUR POLITICAL MESSAGING.

STATING THAT YOU IN NO WAY PROMOTE A CULT OF PERSONALITY, WHICH CHALLENGES LOYALTY TO OUR ADMINISTRATORS, DOES NOT DENY ITS EXISTENCE; INSTEAD, YOU APPEAR INTENT ON DISTANCING YOURSELF FROM YOUR FOLLOWERS' CHOICES, STATING YOU ARE THE "LEADER OF A LARGE POLITICAL MOVEMENT" AND THAT IT'S THE "PEOPLE'S DECISION," SHOWING YOU AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGE IT EXISTS.

THIS CLAIM WOULD ALMOST BE BELIEVABLE, WERE IT NOT FOR THE BOOK TITLED "
QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN CALLAWAY"—ALLUDING DIRECTLY TO MAO'S RED BOOK—, ENCOURAGING REVOLUTIONARY CHANTS AND FANATIC ZEALOTRY, REQUIRING TOTAL LOYALTY TO THE GENERAL SECRETARY, AND DIRECTLY POSITIONING YOURSELF AS LEADER OF THE MOVEMENT AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION, ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING DICTATORSHIP.

TO QUOTE:

"The implementation and announcement of the Enlightened Revolution will be declared by the General Secretary of the Ascensionist Movement when he sees fit. I am the leader of this movement, but you, the Ascensionists, are the collective workers, boldly taking us into this new age."
Foreword, The Enlightened Revolution

"The Ascensionist Movement will purge unreliable, disloyal or suspicious members, ensuring total loyalty to the General Secretary and the Administration."
Chapter Two, The Enlightened Revolution.


YOU HAVE ALSO ENCOURAGED THE CREATION OF POSTERS PRAISING YOURSELF AND YOUR MOVEMENT, PROPAGANDIZING YOUR IMAGE, AND CONTRIBUTING TO YOUR CULT.

This piece of slander was clearly intended to start some kind of movement to coup me from power and install another traitor from the side of the reformers. The reality is this. You have lost. The Ascensionist Movement and Ascensionist parties and politics have won. The liberal reformers, the hideous traitorous Hyper-Republican dogs who now act as insurgent foot soldiers, praising the name of their now deceased leader of City 13, Raymond Acreneuax. Do not mistake this attempt at my removal as some form of political theatre. It is an undercover attempt by insurgent elements to greatly weaken the Administration in a time of turmoil and replace me with someone far more amenable to their cause.

WYATT CALLAWAY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARGUMENTS. HE CLAIMS LIBERALISM AND COMPLACENCY NEED TO BE KILLED, THAT COMPROMISE AND MODERATION ARE TREASONOUS, THAT COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARIES NEED TO BE ELIMINATED, and THAT BREAKING SECURITY COUNCIL LAW IS NORMAL.

HE ISSUES UNILATERAL, DICTATORIAL DECREES, DECLARES ONE-SIDED VICTORIES, RIGS ELECTORAL VOTES, VIOLATES GLOBAL LAW, PUBLICLY INCITES UNREST AND VIOLENCE AGAINST PERCEIVED OPPONENTS, AND NOW ATTEMPTS TO SLANDER OUR PETITION BY CLAIMING WE ARE INSURGENTS WHILE HE MONOPOLIZES POWER. PATHETIC.

IN ADDITION,
JUNIPER STENHOUSE, AGATHA DOE, AND CARTER BRADLEY NEVER WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED CALLAWAY'S DICTATORSHIP, BECAUSE UNLIKE CALLAWAY, CONSTRUCTIVISTS' VALUES PROMOTED THE RULE OF LAW OVER PERSONAL POWER GRABS. THIS, ACCORDING TO ASCENSIONIST BELIEFS, WOULD CLASS THEM AS COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY AND REQUIRE THEIR EXTERMINATION.

ALSO UNLIKE CALLAWAY,
EACH OF THEM IS A SPEAKER AND POLITICIAN MORE CAPABLE THAN HE IS, WHO RIPS FROM MAO.


DESPITE HIS LIBELLOUS ATTEMPTS AT UNDERMINING OUR LEGITIMACY, WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO THE GOALS OF OUR PETITIONS. IF WE ARE TO RETURN TO POLITICAL DECENCY, THEN HE MUST BE REMOVED!

LONG LIVE THE CITY ADMINISTRATION!

GLORY TO ORWELL, VALENTE, AND OUR BENEFACTORS!
 
Last edited:

View attachment 47750
View attachment 47746

A FIRM, DECISIVE REBUTTAL TO CALLAWAY'S LIES.
A RESPONSE TO CALLAWAY'S RESPONSE.


View attachment 47748


WE ARE AWARE OF CALLAWAY'S RESPONSE. WE BELIEVE IT IS MANIPULATIVE, FICTITIOUS, AND WRONG.

STILL, ACTIONS SHOW CALLAWAY IS AN UNLOYAL DICTATOR.

IF POLITICAL FREEDOMS ARE TO BE RESTORED TO THE SECURITY COUNCIL, THEN HE MUST BE REMOVED.

HE WILL LABEL US TERRORISTS, DISSIDENTS, TRAITORS, AND A FABRICATION, BUT THESE ARE SIMPLE FALLACIES MEANT TO DETRACT FROM OUR WORDS AND AVOID ANY GENUINE RESPONSE. THAT IS, SIMPLE STRAWMANS.

WE THEREFORE MAINTAIN OUR PETITION AND CALL UPON THE CITY ADMINISTRATORS TO IMPLEMENT THE FOUR POINTS OF REFORM.

SIGNED,
THE NEO-CONSTRUCTIVISTS.

View attachment 47751








THE ASCENSIONISTS VOTED TO END DEMOCRACY IN AN ASCENSIONIST-RIGGED VOTE. ONCE AGAIN, WE MUST REITERATE, THIS IS ILLEGAL PER SECURITY COUNCIL LAW, LAW WHICH THE CHAIRPERSON DELIBERATELY SOUGHT TO MANIPULATE, DISBAND, AND DESTROY, BUT REMAINS ENSCRIBED IN CHARTER.

NO MATTER HOW MUCH CALLAWAY MAY ARGUE, HIS POSITION DOES NOT GRANT HIM THE AUTHORITY TO AMEND OUR CHARTER. HE CLAIMS HIMSELF SUBSERVIENT TO COUNCIL DEMOCRACY, BUT HAS DISSOLVED ELECTIONS THEMSELVES.

MOREOVER, IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE ISSUANCE OF A UNILATERAL DECREE BY THE CHAIRPERSON—THE SAME DECREES USED TO BAN THE HYPER-REPUBLICANS AND UNBAN GLOBALLY-BANNED FUTURISM AND BREENISM— IS COUNTERINTUITIVE TO YOUR CLAIM OF "DEMOCRACY."

TO USE THAT AS "PROOF" OF YOUR GOODWILL WHEN IT DISPELS YOUR CLAIMS COMPLETELY IS LUDICROUS.

CLEAR HYPOCRISY.

ADDITIONALLY, AT NO POINT DO YOU ADDRESS THE MAIN POINT OF CRITICISM, WHICH IS DISSOLVING ELECTIONS AND INSTITUTING AN ASCENSIONIST-LED DICTATORSHIP NEAR THE END OF YOUR TERM.



"Back themselves up under Ascensionist policies." BEFORE YOUR PURGES, THE CIVIL WORKERS' PARTY WAS THE LARGEST AND MOST ACTIVE BINDER IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL. YOU ALSO CLAIM "LITTLE WILLINGNESS" TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL MECHANISMS WHEN, BEFORE YOUR TERM,
DOZENS OF COLLABORATORS ATTENDED OUR SECURITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, WHEREAS YOU HAVE ON RECORD THREE.

YOU ALSO MISREPRESENT THE PURGES AS "REFORMS," DENYING THE PURGES' TRUE MOTIVE DESPITE USING THESE REFORMS TO CONSOLIDATE POWER, PROMOTE ASCENSIONISM, REMOVE THE OPPOSITION, AND COERCE EXISTING BINDERS TO ALIGN WITH ASCENSIONISM, SUCH AS YOUR MENTIONED THREAT TOWARDS THE CWP.

FURTHERMORE, IN THE AFTERMATH OF THESE PURGES, WHEN THE CIVIL WORKERS' PARTY WENT FROM DOZENS OF MEMBERS TO ONE— VAROS ATKINS—, YOU PROMOTED ASCENSIONISTS CRONIES LIKE WIM DOCHT, ELSA BECKER, AND TROY HENRY HARDWICK TO QUICKLY MONOPOLIZE POWER OVER THE COLLABORATORS' PARTY WITH MANUFACTURED ASCENSIONIST-MAJORITY.

YOUR PURGE, SUBSEQUENT LAWS— LIKE THE LABOUR-POLITICAL NEUTRALITY ACT—, AND THE HOSTILE CLIMATE YOU HAVE CREATED, AS WELL AS THE CREATION OF THE UNITY TRIBUNAL, WHICH, BY ADMISSION, WAS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RESTRICTING NON-ASCENSIONIST APPOINTEES, HAVE CULMINATED IN THEIR METHODICAL DISSOLUTION.



YOU HAVE CONSISTENTLY CALLED FOR THE DEATH AND BULLYING OF POLITICAL OPPONENTS AND PEOPLE YOU PERCEIVED AS TRAITORS TO YOUR CAUSE. YOUR ATTITUDE HERE, AND USE OF DISINGENUOUS RHETORIC, IS BLATANT TWO-FACED BEHAVIOUR, PERFORMATIVE, AND HIGHLIGHTS YOUR GENUINE VULNERABILITY.

ADDITIONALLY, THE CLAIMS THAT THE METADYNAMIST-ASSASSINATIONS WERE "DISPROVEN" ARE BLATANTLY FALSE AND PROPAGANDIZED BY THE CALLAWAY ADMINISTRATION TO JUSTIFY THEIR CONTINUED PERSECUTION OF FRENCH CULTURE, THEIR ALLIANCE WITH THE METADYNAMIST-FUTURISTS, AND THE CONTINUED BLAMING OF HYPER-REPUBLICANS LIBERALS FOR THEIR WOES.



"With no proper opposition in reality, we should seize this opportunity to make ourselves the sole arbiter of loyalism, we become the Security Council. We aim to provoke our enemies, hidden and public, inside the party and snuff them out. This also includes the Unity Tribunal, the system designed to promote and demote those in the party. It must be firmly under our control to ensure every new member is within our binder."

Chapter Two, The Enlightened Revolution.
ARE WE TO ASSUME THAT CALLAWAY'S CREATION OF THE UNITY TRIBUNAL—INCLUDING HIS APPOINTMENT OF MAJORITY ASCENSIONISTS TO THE BOARD—, PUBLIC ADMISSION OF BIAS AND GATEKEEPING, AND ASCENSIONIST MAJORITY IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL ARE SIMPLE COINCIDENCES WHEN HE PUBLICLY STATES OTHERWISE?

CALLAWAY WOULD HAVE YOU FOOL YOU INTO BELIEVING THAT HIS PUBLIC ADMISSION OF BIAS ISN'T SO.

THIS IS THE SAME CALLAWAY WHO PUBLICLY ADMITS TO NEEDING TO FABRICATE ASCENSIONIST ACHIEVEMENTS TO MAINTAIN SUPPORT, STATING, "IF IT IS THE RAREST OF CASES IN WHICH THERE ARE NO ACHIEVEMENTS TO REPORT, THEN THE ACHIEVEMENT MUST BE FABRICATED."

Chapter One, The Enlightened Revolution.




"Business owners guilty of counter-revolution should be evicted or have a notice pinned on their entrance notifying all of their guilt. Anyone who chooses to shop within the establishment should also be punished."
Chapter Three, The Enlightened Revolution.

THIS EXCERPT ENCOURAGES WEAPONIZING EVICTIONS AND FINANCIALLY, AS WELL AS SOCIALLY HARMING BUSINESS OWNERS AND THEIR PATRONS FOR IDEOLOGICAL VIEWS, SLANDERING THEIR REPUTATIONS, AS WELL AS DEFACING STORE PROPERTY WITH INTIMIDATORY MESSAGES AND PUBLIC DENOUNCIATIONS.

"We will call upon all good, loyal citizens to deal with counter-revolutionaries as they see fit. Their interpretation of this is to test their loyalty. They will be blacklisted from society. Their housing will be revoked, forcing them to live in the slums. We cannot have these people walk so freely without harm befalling them; their eventual elimination is merely a consequence of the revolution."
Chapter Three, The Enlightened Revolution.

THIS IS AN INCITEMENT OF VIOLENCE. YOU IMPLICITLY AGREE TO POLITICAL VIOLENCE TO DEAL WITH SO-CALLED "COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARIES," WHO YOU DEFINE AS DISSIDENTS AND COUNTER-COLLABORATORS, TELLING ASCENSIONISTS TO DEAL WITH YOUR ENEMIES "AS THEY SEE FIT" FOR PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.



YOUR FEALTY MEANS NOTHING WHEN YOU HAVE PUBLICLY DENIGRATED THE NAME OF OUR CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO MERE "RELEVANCE" FOR YOUR POLITICAL MESSAGING.

STATING THAT YOU IN NO WAY PROMOTE A CULT OF PERSONALITY, WHICH CHALLENGES LOYALTY TO OUR ADMINISTRATORS, DOES NOT DENY ITS EXISTENCE; INSTEAD, YOU APPEAR INTENT ON DISTANCING YOURSELF FROM YOUR FOLLOWERS' CHOICES, STATING YOU ARE THE "LEADER OF A LARGE POLITICAL MOVEMENT" AND THAT IT'S THE "PEOPLE'S DECISION," SHOWING YOU AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGE IT EXISTS.

THIS CLAIM WOULD ALMOST BE BELIEVABLE, WERE IT NOT FOR THE BOOK TITLED "
QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN CALLAWAY"—ALLUDING DIRECTLY TO MAO'S RED BOOK—, ENCOURAGING REVOLUTIONARY CHANTS AND FANATIC ZEALOTRY, REQUIRING TOTAL LOYALTY TO THE GENERAL SECRETARY, AND DIRECTLY POSITIONING YOURSELF AS LEADER OF THE MOVEMENT AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION, ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING DICTATORSHIP.

TO QUOTE:

"The implementation and announcement of the Enlightened Revolution will be declared by the General Secretary of the Ascensionist Movement when he sees fit. I am the leader of this movement, but you, the Ascensionists, are the collective workers, boldly taking us into this new age."
Foreword, The Enlightened Revolution

"The Ascensionist Movement will purge unreliable, disloyal or suspicious members, ensuring total loyalty to the General Secretary and the Administration."
Chapter Two, The Enlightened Revolution.


YOU HAVE ALSO ENCOURAGED THE CREATION OF POSTERS PRAISING YOURSELF AND YOUR MOVEMENT, PROPAGANDIZING YOUR IMAGE, AND CONTRIBUTING TO YOUR CULT.



WYATT CALLAWAY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARGUMENTS. HE CLAIMS LIBERALISM AND COMPLACENCY NEED TO BE KILLED, THAT COMPROMISE AND MODERATION ARE TREASONOUS, THAT COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARIES NEED TO BE ELIMINATED, and THAT BREAKING SECURITY COUNCIL LAW IS NORMAL.

HE ISSUES UNILATERAL, DICTATORIAL DECREES, DECLARES ONE-SIDED VICTORIES, RIGS ELECTORAL VOTES, VIOLATES GLOBAL LAW, PUBLICLY INCITES UNREST AND VIOLENCE AGAINST PERCEIVED OPPONENTS, AND NOW ATTEMPTS TO SLANDER OUR PETITION BY CLAIMING WE ARE INSURGENTS WHILE HE MONOPOLIZES POWER. PATHETIC.

IN ADDITION,
JUNIPER STENHOUSE, AGATHA DOE, AND CARTER BRADLEY NEVER WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED CALLAWAY'S DICTATORSHIP, BECAUSE UNLIKE CALLAWAY, CONSTRUCTIVISTS BELIEVED IN THE RULE OF LAW. THIS, ACCORDING TO ASCENSIONIST BELIEFS, WOULD CLASS THEM AS COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY AND REQUIRE THEIR EXTERMINATION.

ALSO UNLIKE CALLAWAY,
EACH OF THEM IS A SPEAKER AND POLITICIAN MORE CAPABLE THAN HE IS, WHO RIPS FROM MAO.


DESPITE HIS LIBELLOUS ATTEMPTS AT UNDERMINING OUR LEGITIMACY, WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO THE GOALS OF OUR PETITIONS. IF WE ARE TO RETURN TO POLITICAL DECENCY, THEN HE MUST BE REMOVED!

LONG LIVE THE CITY ADMINISTRATION!

GLORY TO ORWELL, VALENTE, AND OUR BENEFACTORS!

i am agatha doe and i approve this message
 
Back
Top