Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Act #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread Author

I would like to go ahead and apologise before you read the document if anything is too broad or unclear + if the document/text looks like utter garbage. I am currently not a home so the environment is not suitable + iPad google docs is NOT poggers.
Thanks and have fun :approve:​
 
Giving loyalists open or concealed carry of melee weapons with the explicit intention of them being used as melee weapons, as well as access to firearms is an absolutely horrible idea. Primarily because it's silly as fuck for some mega loyalist T6 who is friends with the board to draw a 9mm and shoot a rebel in the face like some CvR server instead of having to rely on staying around areas that they are likely to not be abducted or attacked in

Core CCA is different, but even then thats unlikely to apply since they get bodyguards who carry a whole lot more gun than them.
 
Giving loyalists open or concealed carry of melee weapons with the explicit intention of them being used as melee weapons, as well as access to firearms is an absolutely horrible idea. Primarily because it's silly as fuck for some mega loyalist T6 who is friends with the board to draw a 9mm and shoot a rebel in the face like some CvR server instead of having to rely on staying around areas that they are likely to not be abducted or attacked in

Core CCA is different, but even then thats unlikely to apply since they get bodyguards who carry a whole lot more gun than them.
It's pretty silly too that rebels can make hatchets and automatic smgs out of junk they find like some kind of survival crafting game.
 
1644220916489.png

:: CITY TWENTY FOUR ::
:: MESSAGE FROM ::
:: VICE ADMINISTRATOR - BERNARD MULLIGAN ::

Dear Tony Jenkins,

In regards to Act #25, a legislation in which you've put forth. Section 1, 1.2 must be removed immediately, in order for this legislation to be considered valid. Due to the nature of 1.2 itself, I don't believe I have to explain to you... A Tier Four Collaborator, why this simply cannot be enacted. This order on behalf of the administration and the Ministry of Civil Protection, is final. 1644220740219.png
​
 
PA_HIRKOUMI_B.png
<:: INCOMING TRANSMISSION ::>
Dear Collaborator;

Act Twenty-Five has been vetoed by the Office of the City Administrator, and thus through this, has been placed into the rejected section of legislations. Due to the status of the legislation, this can not be appealed nor can further attempts to bring the legislation forth to the assembly until futher notice from the Office of the City Administrator.

FINAL CONCLUSION:
REJECTED.

REASON:
VETO'D BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top