Admin Abuse (Insult, Manipulation, Censorship) by M!NT

[Vewoth]

REPORT OF ADMIN ABUSE BY M!NT FOR INSULT, MANIPULATION (GASLIGHTING) AND CENSORSHIP



For full evidence and context, please reference M!NT's post in the previously rejected report (EDIT: M!NT did not reject the report)

https://willard.network/forums/thre...and-proposal-of-a-new-ban-appeal-system.8636/

INSULT AND GASLIGHTING (MANIPULATION)​

So if it isn't enough to be insulted by one admin, now it's BY two, and for the same thing.

​

​

Putting "Relatively speaking" doesn't diminish the insult. Because this is now a second offense, and separate, this is a second and separate admin abuse report.​

As for the previous abuse report, the insult, double jeopardy, and arguments made against an excessive ban were not addressed, only gaslighted by the incorrect application of fallacies, which does not address arguments, their premises, their claims, etc.

And rather than actually consider my arguments, he instead gaslights the shit out of them by trying to apply "logical fallacies" to them. That works, if you analyze the arguments and deconstruct them. Instead, he'd quote something out of context without analyzing the argument holistically (soundness v validity, premise v. cause), call it a "fallacy" and did that until he felt satisfied to reply. Arguments (and consequently the abuse report as a whole) went unconsidered, and I was insulted again. They till stand. Attacking credibility without attacking the arguments, points and individual claims, warrants and data is called gaslighting (manipulation).

Doing so with authority is called abuse (censorship). You clearly don't like what I said in the thread, but there was evidence. You didn't look at the evidence, only what you disliked. You replied to it on the grounds you disliked it and listed why (the incorrect application of fallacies). This is censorship. You didn't like it.

@Imperator RAD-X Can you please tell your admins to stop telling people they're stupid, in literally the same language ("You DO have a narrow perspective"). At this point it's an habitual issue.

The previous admin abuse thread was rejected with poor judgment, if based on the incorrect application of fallacies. and without addressing the arguments of abuse, but only trying a cheap shot at undermining the credibility (gaslighting) of the arguments and me (calling me stupid), in order to close the thread. The evidence (insult) was not addressed. The excessive ban was not addressed. Double Jeopardy was only lightly addressed.

Abuse has now occurred twice, and concerning the same incident, but now by two, separate admins.

CENSORSHIP (He didn't like what I said, but evidence still existed and went unaddressed = Censorship)​

But there's a bigger problem here than just the abuse and manipulation at play. If the gaslighting of my arguments in the abuse thread wasn't enough, now my abuse thread was gaslighted itself. Apparently, trying to report an admin for abuse is now trying "to make a huge problem for the admin team" as M!NT said at the end of the post. So, if someone tries to make a detailed and indepth response, it's going to be interpreted as being a problem. And if an admin doesn't like what you report, community, they will reject it.

That's a literally a system in a cycle of protecting abuse. Member makes abuse report > abuse report gets rejected for being long and in depth, and member gets insulted with the same insult, again.

So, because making detailed and logical reports is now considered as being a problem, I'll keep this abuse report very simple and direct.

M!INT insulted me, the evidence is in the rejected abuse report. M!NT did not address any of my arguments, their premises, their claims, their validity or soundness, but instead thought that a thought experiment of incorrectly applying fallacies to someone who majored in philosophy with a focus on logic was, in fact, the sound and valid thing to do. It's not, it's gaslighting and manipulation. And then of course, insulting a person and gaslighting the shit out of them in a report about admin abuse is the most ironic thing so far.

M!NT's argument to reject the abuse report, and the way he supported the rejection of it, what he said, is unprofessional, it's disrespectful (when I've been nothing but respectful to the admin team), it's embarrassing for the community and the WN staff, it's abusive, it's demonstrative of poor judgment and abuse that apparently is now across the staff, and not just one admin, it warrants reconsideration of now just the first abuse report against @Rabithunter but also the ban appeal, because both parties who exercise consistently poor judgment seem to be influential in it.

As a personal note, it's also disappointing. I try and not take making an abuse report lightly, and I get told I'm making trouble because I suppose someone thought it was too long. I try and be respectful while having a month long ban ahead of me, and I'm trashtalked, insulted again, and beat down by someone with more power in this realm. This is abuse. No matter which way you define it.

To the community: If you let this abuse report and censorship go unpunished, it's going to happen to you.

You'll be told you're making problems for trying to be as in depth and detailed as possible in your appeals or abuse reports, and censored. I've been insulted twice, you'll be insulted. I've been gaslighted, you'll be gaslighted. This has to stop. Now. @Imperator RAD-X and community members, please review this abuse report and take action. At first it was an investigation, now it's clearly systemic abuse, and M!INT has made that clear in their actions.

@M!NT You literally insulted the person who made an admin abuse about an admin insulting them, using the same insult. You gaslighted the shit out of their arguments, and then supported a rejection of the abuse report because you didn't like it, without writing about the merits of the arguments (each, individual claim, warrant and data).

Your behavior is downright childish.

@Imperator RAD-X What is going on at WN Staff? What kind of standards and judgment do they have? Can M!NT be trusted to moderate the community acting so childish?

CONCLUSION​

To reiterate, this is a separate admin abuse report against @M!NT , please do not confuse this for the first that I still consider outstanding and warranting attention by the server director at this point, because it was closed in an emotional, childish exercise of poor judgment. After two senior admins are on a killstreak of insulting and beating up the same person whose already on a month ban and owned up to his mistakes, and showed nothing but respect and consideration for their points of view, this is abuse. No matter which way you look at it.

Members of the community and WN Staff, please provide input and review this report immediately. Action must be taken.

 

[WompyTree]

Bruh just take the L and move on.

 

[M!NT]

I didn't reject the thread or close it actually.

 

[KG!]

How to Make an Atomic Bomb - A Post on How to Create Hiroshima and Nagasaki 2.0

With a few parts from a hardware store and some know-how, it is possible to build a weapon of mass destruction. Well, as long as you can find a few pounds of plutonium on Ebay to fuel it. In 1905 Albert Einstein wrote a number of revolutionary physics papers including his Special Theory of Relativity. One of the formulas that came out of this, almost as an afterthought, was E=mc². That is: energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared. What Einstein was saying is that matter - everything around us we can touch and see - is actually the same thing as energy, just in a different form. The upshot of this is that it should be possible to convert energy to matter or, visa versa, convert matter to energy. The energy we release every day when driving our car or cooking on a stove comes from chemical reactions. Two or more chemicals react through the motion of electrons and the forming and breaking of chemical bonds. One familiar form of chemical reaction is combustion. For example, the oxygen in the air reacts with the substances in a candle to release heat and light. In chemical reactions the amount of measurable matter involves never changes, if you were able to capture all the soot, smoke and carbon dioxide released by the candle you would find they weigh exactly the same amount as the original candle and oxygen that reacted with it. The material changed form and released energy but did not disappear. Einstein's formula suggested that it was possible to get energy by what we now call a nuclear reaction. This is the conversion of matter to energy. What's more, the amount of energy available in even a small amount of matter is, according to the formula, tremendous. Matter is just sort of a condensed version of energy, but it isn't a one-to-one relationship. The conversion factor is the speed of light (already a huge number) squared (which makes it a really big number). We can picture this relationship by thinking about water and steam. You can cool steam (think of this as the energy) down and it becomes water (think of this as matter) or heat water up to make steam. It takes a lot of steam to create a few drops of water though, but only few a ounces of water to create a whole room full of steam. The same is true of energy and matter. In the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima only 600 milligrams of uranium (less than the weight of a dime) was converted to energy, but it released the same amount of power as at least 13,000 tons of the conventional chemical explosive TNT. Converting matter to energy is no easy trick, however. The sun does it naturally by a process called fusion. The sun, a gigantic ball of mostly hydrogen gas, has intense pressures and heat created at its core by its gravity. It is under this heat and pressure that the hydrogen atoms fuse to create helium and release energy. Re-creating the intense conditions required to generate fusion on earth isn't easy, however, so atomic bombs uses another process called fission.

Fission Reactions

1)A neutron strikes a uranium atom 2)The uranium atom is split into a krypton atom and a barium atom releasing some binding energy along with more neutrons. 3)The neutrons strike other uranium atoms starting the process all over again.

A fission reaction is just the opposite of fusion. Instead of atoms being put together, they are split into pieces. When a neutron (a subatomic particle) with enough energy hits an atom of radioactive material like uranium, the uranium atom will split into two smaller atoms and some of the energy that held the original atom together is released. If the right type of uranium is used, the split will also release additional neutrons capable of splitting other atoms. If this process continues with each new split releasing neutrons which in turn split other atoms it is called a chain reaction. Because of the speed involved in a nuclear reaction, billions of atoms can be split in a tiny fraction of a second. If the reaction proceeds at a sedate level the fission produces energy in a controllable manner. This is what is going on in the heart of a nuclear power plant. The energy released is used to heat water to the point of steam and the steam spins turbines connected to generators to make electricity. If the reaction proceeds at an uncontrolled level, however, a nuclear explosion can result. This might seem to make nuclear power plants potential atomic bombs, but the uranium used in the plants is not the type that could sustain a reaction at a rate high enough to cause an explosion by itself (nuclear power plants are subject to explosions caused by steam pressure and other non-nuclear forces, however). In fact, engineering a device that does not tear itself apart before the explosion really gets underway is one of the main design problems of building a bomb. Bomb Design Uranium or plutonium can be used as fuel for atomic bombs. Both are highly radioactive. This means they are constantly shedding subatomic particles including neutrons. Only certain isotopes of these materials - like uranium 235 and plutonium 239 - consistently give off neutrons of such high energy that they will split atoms. When enough of the material is put together, a chain reaction starts and the mass is said to be critical. The term used for a mass of radioactive material with a growing chain reaction, splitting more and more atoms with each moment, is supercritical. While putting enough uranium 235 together in a single mass will make it supercritical (and create a surge of radiation that will kill you if you are standing near it unprotected) it is not enough to create a bomb. The material must be held in a compressed state long enough for the reaction to take place while resisting the initial energy of the explosion that will try and tear it apart. There are two well-known approaches to doing this. The first is known as the "gun" method.

The Gun Method

A conventional explosive drives the uranium "bullet" into the "spike;" bringing the mass to supercritical and causing the detonation.

The "gun" is the simplest way to build a nuclear weapon. The atomic bomb used on Hiroshima during World War II used this approach. The weapon consists of a tube (much like the barrel of a gun) with half the nuclear charge fixed at one end and the other half (the moving half) at the opposite end. A conventional explosive charge was placed behind the moving portion which can be thought of as the "bullet." When the conventional charge is detonated, the bullet races down the tube and slams into the fixed charge at the other end (referred to as the "spike"). Once the two halves of the nuclear fuel are brought together and held together long enough, the chain reaction starts, the fuel goes supercritical and the explosion takes place. While the gun method is easy to engineer, it has some drawbacks. The biggest one is the need to make sure the two parts of nuclear fuel come together rapidly enough. As the two sections get about an inch apart, they will start exchanging neutrons that might start a chain reaction. If the two parts go supercritical before they get close enough, the force of the energy released will blow them apart before the main explosion gets underway. This type of failure is known as a "fizzle." Another problem is that this method is less efficient, requiring between 20 and 25 kilograms (around 44 to 55 pounds) of uranium. Other approaches can use as little as 15 kilograms (about 33 pounds). Given that weapon's grade uranium and plutonium are very hard to get, this is a real disadvantage. Also, the gun method only works if the uranium is being used as the fuel. The process of creating plutonium generally causes it to be contaminated with other materials which increase the chance of it going supercritical before the two sections are close enough together. This, in turn, increases the chances of a fizzle instead of a blast. To make the gun method work reliably with plutonium, you would have to increase the speed with which the "bullet" approached the "spike" significantly. To do this would mean making the tube impracticality long.

The Implosion Design

Conventional explosives press on the "tamper/pusher," compressing the plutonium until it reaches a supercritical mass. The initiator floods the area with neutrons to help get the chain reaction going.

For this reason, if you use plutonium to fuel a bomb you need to use the more sophisticated "implosion" method. With this approach the nuclear fuel is shaped into a sphere (called the "pit"). Conventional explosives are put around it. When these are detonated the force of the explosion squeezes the pit into a supercritical mass long enough for the explosion to take place. While the principle sounds easy, it is difficult to actually make it work. The pit cannot simply be surrounded by high explosives. The shock wave that compresses it must be precisely spherical, otherwise the pit material will escape out through a weak point. To create the necessary explosive force in a perfect sphere, shaped explosive charges (sometimes called explosive lens) are used. The "fatman" bomb the leveled Nagasaki in World War II used 32 charges arranged around the pit like the faces of a soccer ball. In order to create the spherical shock wave it isn't only necessary to get the charges in the right position with the right shape, but they must be detonated at exactly the right time. A charge that detonates late will create a hole in the shock wave through which the pit can escape.

Implosion designs also require a neutron trigger or "initiator" to flood the pit with neutrons during detonation. In "fatman" this was done with a small sphere with layers of beryllium and polonium separated by thin gold foil placed in the center of the pit. An implosion design may also include other layers between the explosives and the pit to create a more powerful explosion. These include a "pusher" (designed to increase the explosive shock wave hitting the pit), a "tamper" (to help the pit from blowing apart too quickly once the explosion starts), and a "reflector" composed of a material that will reflect neutrons back in the pit increasing the amount of fission. In some bomb designs these functions are integrated into a single layer of material. The implosion design is generally considered to be superior in almost every way to the gun design and it is the choice for any organization with the resources to design and construct it. One of the major advantages of this approach is that it is easy to make the implosion design more efficient by increasing the effectiveness of the conventional explosives. For example, if the pit is squeezed so that the density is doubled during detonation it may yield a 10-kiloton explosion. If that same pit can be compressed to three times its original density, a 40-kiloton explosion can be generated with no additional nuclear fuel. The longer the fission material is allowed to react, the bigger the explosion. Could You Build a Bomb? Building a basic nuclear weapon is not easy, but not all that hard either. In 1964 the U.S. Army decided to see just how difficult it was. They hired two professors that had Ph.Ds in physics, but no experience with nuclear weapons or access to nuclear secrets. The two were given the task of designing an atomic bomb using only information available to the general public. It took them roughly two years, but in the end they designed an implosion style weapon that could have been made in a local machine shop which could have produced an explosion similar to the Hiroshima bomb. The only thing that they found extremely difficult to do was to get the proper material to fuel the bomb: uranium 235 or plutonium 239. Only a tiny fraction of natural uranium that is mined from the ground is isotope 235 and separating it from the other isotopes is a major chore requiring huge factory complexes working years to isolate just a few pounds. In fact, most weapons programs get around this by utilizing plutonium, which is very rarely in found nature at all, but can be created by exposing more common types of uranium to radiation in a nuclear "breeder" reactor. Plutonium is extremely difficult to handle, however. It is one of the most toxic materials known to man, especially if inhaled. It is the difficulty of getting and handling these fissionable materials that protects us from people building nuclear bombs in their basements. It is for this reason nonproliferation of nuclear material is a major concern of most governments and there is great apprehension about countries who want to build nuclear reactors capable of "breeding" plutonium fuel. Knowledge of how to build a bomb is hard to control. Fortunately, so far, the materials needed have been much easier to keep track of. But for how long?

 

[WompyTree]

How to Make an Atomic Bomb - A Post on How to Create Hiroshima and Nagasaki 2.0

With a few parts from a hardware store and some know-how, it is possible to build a weapon of mass destruction. Well, as long as you can find a few pounds of plutonium on Ebay to fuel it. In 1905 Albert Einstein wrote a number of revolutionary physics papers including his Special Theory of Relativity. One of the formulas that came out of this, almost as an afterthought, was E=mc². That is: energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared. What Einstein was saying is that matter - everything around us we can touch and see - is actually the same thing as energy, just in a different form. The upshot of this is that it should be possible to convert energy to matter or, visa versa, convert matter to energy. The energy we release every day when driving our car or cooking on a stove comes from chemical reactions. Two or more chemicals react through the motion of electrons and the forming and breaking of chemical bonds. One familiar form of chemical reaction is combustion. For example, the oxygen in the air reacts with the substances in a candle to release heat and light. In chemical reactions the amount of measurable matter involves never changes, if you were able to capture all the soot, smoke and carbon dioxide released by the candle you would find they weigh exactly the same amount as the original candle and oxygen that reacted with it. The material changed form and released energy but did not disappear. Einstein's formula suggested that it was possible to get energy by what we now call a nuclear reaction. This is the conversion of matter to energy. What's more, the amount of energy available in even a small amount of matter is, according to the formula, tremendous. Matter is just sort of a condensed version of energy, but it isn't a one-to-one relationship. The conversion factor is the speed of light (already a huge number) squared (which makes it a really big number). We can picture this relationship by thinking about water and steam. You can cool steam (think of this as the energy) down and it becomes water (think of this as matter) or heat water up to make steam. It takes a lot of steam to create a few drops of water though, but only few a ounces of water to create a whole room full of steam. The same is true of energy and matter. In the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima only 600 milligrams of uranium (less than the weight of a dime) was converted to energy, but it released the same amount of power as at least 13,000 tons of the conventional chemical explosive TNT. Converting matter to energy is no easy trick, however. The sun does it naturally by a process called fusion. The sun, a gigantic ball of mostly hydrogen gas, has intense pressures and heat created at its core by its gravity. It is under this heat and pressure that the hydrogen atoms fuse to create helium and release energy. Re-creating the intense conditions required to generate fusion on earth isn't easy, however, so atomic bombs uses another process called fission.

Fission Reactions

1)A neutron strikes a uranium atom 2)The uranium atom is split into a krypton atom and a barium atom releasing some binding energy along with more neutrons. 3)The neutrons strike other uranium atoms starting the process all over again.

A fission reaction is just the opposite of fusion. Instead of atoms being put together, they are split into pieces. When a neutron (a subatomic particle) with enough energy hits an atom of radioactive material like uranium, the uranium atom will split into two smaller atoms and some of the energy that held the original atom together is released. If the right type of uranium is used, the split will also release additional neutrons capable of splitting other atoms. If this process continues with each new split releasing neutrons which in turn split other atoms it is called a chain reaction. Because of the speed involved in a nuclear reaction, billions of atoms can be split in a tiny fraction of a second. If the reaction proceeds at a sedate level the fission produces energy in a controllable manner. This is what is going on in the heart of a nuclear power plant. The energy released is used to heat water to the point of steam and the steam spins turbines connected to generators to make electricity. If the reaction proceeds at an uncontrolled level, however, a nuclear explosion can result. This might seem to make nuclear power plants potential atomic bombs, but the uranium used in the plants is not the type that could sustain a reaction at a rate high enough to cause an explosion by itself (nuclear power plants are subject to explosions caused by steam pressure and other non-nuclear forces, however). In fact, engineering a device that does not tear itself apart before the explosion really gets underway is one of the main design problems of building a bomb. Bomb Design Uranium or plutonium can be used as fuel for atomic bombs. Both are highly radioactive. This means they are constantly shedding subatomic particles including neutrons. Only certain isotopes of these materials - like uranium 235 and plutonium 239 - consistently give off neutrons of such high energy that they will split atoms. When enough of the material is put together, a chain reaction starts and the mass is said to be critical. The term used for a mass of radioactive material with a growing chain reaction, splitting more and more atoms with each moment, is supercritical. While putting enough uranium 235 together in a single mass will make it supercritical (and create a surge of radiation that will kill you if you are standing near it unprotected) it is not enough to create a bomb. The material must be held in a compressed state long enough for the reaction to take place while resisting the initial energy of the explosion that will try and tear it apart. There are two well-known approaches to doing this. The first is known as the "gun" method.

The Gun Method

A conventional explosive drives the uranium "bullet" into the "spike;" bringing the mass to supercritical and causing the detonation.

The "gun" is the simplest way to build a nuclear weapon. The atomic bomb used on Hiroshima during World War II used this approach. The weapon consists of a tube (much like the barrel of a gun) with half the nuclear charge fixed at one end and the other half (the moving half) at the opposite end. A conventional explosive charge was placed behind the moving portion which can be thought of as the "bullet." When the conventional charge is detonated, the bullet races down the tube and slams into the fixed charge at the other end (referred to as the "spike"). Once the two halves of the nuclear fuel are brought together and held together long enough, the chain reaction starts, the fuel goes supercritical and the explosion takes place. While the gun method is easy to engineer, it has some drawbacks. The biggest one is the need to make sure the two parts of nuclear fuel come together rapidly enough. As the two sections get about an inch apart, they will start exchanging neutrons that might start a chain reaction. If the two parts go supercritical before they get close enough, the force of the energy released will blow them apart before the main explosion gets underway. This type of failure is known as a "fizzle." Another problem is that this method is less efficient, requiring between 20 and 25 kilograms (around 44 to 55 pounds) of uranium. Other approaches can use as little as 15 kilograms (about 33 pounds). Given that weapon's grade uranium and plutonium are very hard to get, this is a real disadvantage. Also, the gun method only works if the uranium is being used as the fuel. The process of creating plutonium generally causes it to be contaminated with other materials which increase the chance of it going supercritical before the two sections are close enough together. This, in turn, increases the chances of a fizzle instead of a blast. To make the gun method work reliably with plutonium, you would have to increase the speed with which the "bullet" approached the "spike" significantly. To do this would mean making the tube impracticality long.

The Implosion Design

Conventional explosives press on the "tamper/pusher," compressing the plutonium until it reaches a supercritical mass. The initiator floods the area with neutrons to help get the chain reaction going.

For this reason, if you use plutonium to fuel a bomb you need to use the more sophisticated "implosion" method. With this approach the nuclear fuel is shaped into a sphere (called the "pit"). Conventional explosives are put around it. When these are detonated the force of the explosion squeezes the pit into a supercritical mass long enough for the explosion to take place. While the principle sounds easy, it is difficult to actually make it work. The pit cannot simply be surrounded by high explosives. The shock wave that compresses it must be precisely spherical, otherwise the pit material will escape out through a weak point. To create the necessary explosive force in a perfect sphere, shaped explosive charges (sometimes called explosive lens) are used. The "fatman" bomb the leveled Nagasaki in World War II used 32 charges arranged around the pit like the faces of a soccer ball. In order to create the spherical shock wave it isn't only necessary to get the charges in the right position with the right shape, but they must be detonated at exactly the right time. A charge that detonates late will create a hole in the shock wave through which the pit can escape.

Implosion designs also require a neutron trigger or "initiator" to flood the pit with neutrons during detonation. In "fatman" this was done with a small sphere with layers of beryllium and polonium separated by thin gold foil placed in the center of the pit. An implosion design may also include other layers between the explosives and the pit to create a more powerful explosion. These include a "pusher" (designed to increase the explosive shock wave hitting the pit), a "tamper" (to help the pit from blowing apart too quickly once the explosion starts), and a "reflector" composed of a material that will reflect neutrons back in the pit increasing the amount of fission. In some bomb designs these functions are integrated into a single layer of material. The implosion design is generally considered to be superior in almost every way to the gun design and it is the choice for any organization with the resources to design and construct it. One of the major advantages of this approach is that it is easy to make the implosion design more efficient by increasing the effectiveness of the conventional explosives. For example, if the pit is squeezed so that the density is doubled during detonation it may yield a 10-kiloton explosion. If that same pit can be compressed to three times its original density, a 40-kiloton explosion can be generated with no additional nuclear fuel. The longer the fission material is allowed to react, the bigger the explosion. Could You Build a Bomb? Building a basic nuclear weapon is not easy, but not all that hard either. In 1964 the U.S. Army decided to see just how difficult it was. They hired two professors that had Ph.Ds in physics, but no experience with nuclear weapons or access to nuclear secrets. The two were given the task of designing an atomic bomb using only information available to the general public. It took them roughly two years, but in the end they designed an implosion style weapon that could have been made in a local machine shop which could have produced an explosion similar to the Hiroshima bomb. The only thing that they found extremely difficult to do was to get the proper material to fuel the bomb: uranium 235 or plutonium 239. Only a tiny fraction of natural uranium that is mined from the ground is isotope 235 and separating it from the other isotopes is a major chore requiring huge factory complexes working years to isolate just a few pounds. In fact, most weapons programs get around this by utilizing plutonium, which is very rarely in found nature at all, but can be created by exposing more common types of uranium to radiation in a nuclear "breeder" reactor. Plutonium is extremely difficult to handle, however. It is one of the most toxic materials known to man, especially if inhaled. It is the difficulty of getting and handling these fissionable materials that protects us from people building nuclear bombs in their basements. It is for this reason nonproliferation of nuclear material is a major concern of most governments and there is great apprehension about countries who want to build nuclear reactors capable of "breeding" plutonium fuel. Knowledge of how to build a bomb is hard to control. Fortunately, so far, the materials needed have been much easier to keep track of. But for how long?

10/10 worked. I am now dead.

 

[Vewoth]

I didn't reject the thread or close it actually.

Edited to reflect that you did not reject it, though made unsound argument to reject it.

You insulted me, and the tone of your post is downright childish. That's the point here.

You shouldn't be able to insult people on the forums, to create a unsound post that manipulates their argument, and then for that supporting post to qualify as cause to reject the abuse report.

Bruh just take the L and move on.

It's no longer just about the previous abuse report or the ban. This is habitually unprofessional and disrespectful behavior, and possible censorship, on behalf of these two moderators. If you give in to this, because they exercise power, the abuse wins.

This abuse report is about your abusive post.

 

[toby]

Me Personally, This Time I Side With "The Bitch"

 

[WompyTree]

It's no longer just about the previous abuse report or the ban. This is habitually unprofessional and disrespectful behavior, and possible censorship, on behalf of these two moderators. If you give in to this, because they exercise power, the abuse wins.

Mate. You've done nothing but make yourself look like a fool the last couple of days by continuing to fight for something which has been absolutely difficult to prove. You've accused people of favouritism, insulting you, bias and who knows what else. It was cute at the start but now it's gone for too long and the novelty has worn off. At this rate, if I was part of staff I'd extend your ban because this is absolutely fucking ridiculous.

 

[Deleted member 2717]

 

[ZeroPants]

 

[Imperator RAD-X]

I looked over the previous thread. Vewoth, you need to relax. Not once did M!NT insult you. If the only thing he's guilty of doing, then he's guilty of throwing you a curveball.

I closed the thread because its sole main purpose was lost to this tirade. Now it's this.

These guys are not corporate servants - they're guys that sit behind a screen like me to play GMOD. If it's abuse to tell you that you're overstretching, you're overstretching. Rabit apologised to you and that should have been the end of it. I'm not holding my staff liable or accountable for misdemeanour regarding this situation for not licking the boots of the complaint.

Nobody gets this treatment as you're describing because it simply doesn't happen. Take a chill pill, nobody is manipulating you - they're just giving you a hard curveball. If these replies from the others aren't telling you something, I don't know what it is.

You've asked me to take action - I'm taking action now. I will contact the UN Secretary and make sure that the delegation knows of this thread. The secretary may make sure to bring it to the UN High Court of Appeals.

Thread is locked, move on with your day / be on your way.