Anilife
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2022
- Messages
- 85
- Thread Author
- #1
Steam Name: Ani
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:468510009
Name of the Admin you were warned by: @Goose
How long is the ban for?: 360 minutes
The reason you were banned?:
Ignoring staff to change the situation because you didn't like the outcome.
Why do you wish to be unbanned?:
- Ryebread had a C4 item on his character, that was not given to the group of players and was deleted by staff without the players being consulted. It was taken IC, after his character was slain by a Security Corp Patrol.
-The /it I did was supported by staff one even added an explosion effect to officialize it. (Seen in screenshot/evidence)
-There was multiple inputs, from Hayden and Fredurka and either were unclear. No admin ever stated 'The bomb will not blow up'. So I proceeded with Freedom of Roleplay and did my own /itl
****' The charge sets, exploding in the cooridor- shrapnel shoots out and past the open door way. The pressure in the air, cracked ears of those around them. The door- intact
****' Despite waiting, the C4 never goes off. It seems perhaps it's faulty, in need of further inspection. Either way, it's unlikely it would damage the blast-resistant bunker doors.
[1-11 QT16] [A strong-jawed gung-ho American repre...] whispers: "// lol these conflicting ass /it's."
a second later, a /itl also comes up (Not a /event, so no indication of this being an admin verdict/input in the situation)
Take note of "[1-11 QT16] [A strong-jawed gung-ho American repre...] whispers: "// lol these conflicting ass /it's." even another player is unsure which /itl to follow as its literally not a /event or an admin stating that the second /itl was their input
- There was no harm in the end. It was a quick thing that the players came together to do, banning someone out of it just seems injust, especially coming from goose - @Kappatalist has dealt with two appeals where instead of it being dealt with in-game in the moment Goose would either just warn or ban me. It doesn't really add up. But overall this is an event where players are meant to have fun, going out and just banning players, while also having a history of banning players, seems uneeded. Not to mention no players made reports because EVERYONE was fine with the outcome.
Do you have any picture or video evidence to support your reason?:
Ryebred, having the C4 rendered null without informing the players directly.
Admin placed effect, after my /itl.
SteamID: STEAM_0:1:468510009
Name of the Admin you were warned by: @Goose
How long is the ban for?: 360 minutes
The reason you were banned?:
Ignoring staff to change the situation because you didn't like the outcome.
Why do you wish to be unbanned?:
- Ryebread had a C4 item on his character, that was not given to the group of players and was deleted by staff without the players being consulted. It was taken IC, after his character was slain by a Security Corp Patrol.
-The /it I did was supported by staff one even added an explosion effect to officialize it. (Seen in screenshot/evidence)
-There was multiple inputs, from Hayden and Fredurka and either were unclear. No admin ever stated 'The bomb will not blow up'. So I proceeded with Freedom of Roleplay and did my own /itl
****' The charge sets, exploding in the cooridor- shrapnel shoots out and past the open door way. The pressure in the air, cracked ears of those around them. The door- intact
****' Despite waiting, the C4 never goes off. It seems perhaps it's faulty, in need of further inspection. Either way, it's unlikely it would damage the blast-resistant bunker doors.
[1-11 QT16] [A strong-jawed gung-ho American repre...] whispers: "// lol these conflicting ass /it's."
a second later, a /itl also comes up (Not a /event, so no indication of this being an admin verdict/input in the situation)
Take note of "[1-11 QT16] [A strong-jawed gung-ho American repre...] whispers: "// lol these conflicting ass /it's." even another player is unsure which /itl to follow as its literally not a /event or an admin stating that the second /itl was their input
- There was no harm in the end. It was a quick thing that the players came together to do, banning someone out of it just seems injust, especially coming from goose - @Kappatalist has dealt with two appeals where instead of it being dealt with in-game in the moment Goose would either just warn or ban me. It doesn't really add up. But overall this is an event where players are meant to have fun, going out and just banning players, while also having a history of banning players, seems uneeded. Not to mention no players made reports because EVERYONE was fine with the outcome.
Do you have any picture or video evidence to support your reason?:
Ryebred, having the C4 rendered null without informing the players directly.
Admin placed effect, after my /itl.
