Make group locks, GROUP locks.

[FieldersNL]

Any CP can use group locks and it seems unintended for its sole purpose. Either fixing it or implement a rule about it should do.

 

[Rebel RP Philosopher]

It should not be a combine lock if it is a group lock for rebels, group locks as currently being accessible to CPs makes it possible to run city groups which is supported by CP enforcement. Have it rather a group padlock which claims a door for a group so you can use keys swep, only if you are a group member. If a group member is kicked, well - consider the codelock being changed as you'd otherwise do if you lost the spare keys to your house to an unwanted person.

 

[TheGamingPlumber]

It should not be a combine lock if it is a group lock for rebels, group locks as currently being accessible to CPs makes it possible to run city groups which is supported by CP enforcement. Have it rather a group padlock which claims a door for a group so you can use keys swep, only if you are a group member. If a group member is kicked, well - consider the codelock being changed as you'd otherwise do if you lost the spare keys to your house to an unwanted person.

You talk as if you still play

 

[BantaMan]

+1

It's silly given the cost of those things too

 

[TheGamingPlumber]

Also group padlock makes no difference since they can just do /kickdoor

 

[Robert]

Any CP can use group locks and it seems unintended for its sole purpose. Either fixing it or implement a rule about it should do.

CPs already have a rule to not open Group locks so you are aware. They know they are strictly forbidden from opening group locks, but this cannot be fixed dev wise as it would require rewriting the whole lock system.

But generally yes, CPs do not touch group locks for a reason and thats because they have a rule against it which could get them kicked, banned or outright blacklisted and removed. So it is a rule for them. Its why when they raid bases on Terminal 7 for example, they had to blow the lock off prior to raiding as the locak is not something they could open.

So not really an issue tbh.

 

[FieldersNL]

CPs already have a rule to not open Group locks so you are aware. They know they are strictly forbidden from opening group locks, but this cannot be fixed dev wise as it would require rewriting the whole lock system.

But generally yes, CPs do not touch group locks for a reason and thats because they have a rule against it which could get them kicked, banned or outright blacklisted and removed. So it is a rule for them. Its why when they raid bases on Terminal 7 for example, they had to blow the lock off prior to raiding as the locak is not something they could open.

So not really an issue tbh.

Then there were 2 incidents recently where they entered the base casually using the locks, got no taglines because they said 'its not a metabase'

 

[BantaMan]

CPs already have a rule to not open Group locks so you are aware. They know they are strictly forbidden from opening group locks, but this cannot be fixed dev wise as it would require rewriting the whole lock system.

But generally yes, CPs do not touch group locks for a reason and thats because they have a rule against it which could get them kicked, banned or outright blacklisted and removed. So it is a rule for them. Its why when they raid bases on Terminal 7 for example, they had to blow the lock off prior to raiding as the locak is not something they could open.

So not really an issue tbh.

Sadly I am afraid cops do not follow this rule.

 

[Elsida]

Sadly I am afraid cops do not follow this rule.

I do :3

 

[Atom]

I say we hang all cops

 

[Robert]

Sadly I am afraid cops do not follow this rule.

 

[BantaMan]

I see three imposters...very sus