Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

My PK Appeal Denial.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marco

Radio Bob Approved
Protector
Joined
Jul 5, 2021
Messages
1,256

1764017357106.png

Why were these aspects highlighted for my PK Appeal denial; when... they all act in favour for my characters survival?

I was not given a chance to roleplay; I was shot while typing, with a copy-pasted /me execution.




Allow me to repost my video.

View attachment Garry's Mod - 2025-11-24 18-51-06.mp4


I do not think this PK is correct, nor the verdict justified. Hence, I am making a complaint thread.





 
This does not excuse rushed RP. If you realistically can't meet the RP requirments for an execution that execution should not happen. There is no resonable excuse for the following things:

- A character is shot mid-typing giving them no resonable time to react in any way
- A copy paste /me is used to execute a character with sloppy RP
- An executon is done in the most public area of the bunker with more than 4 doctors and 1 vort present in the same area
I didn't see any doctors personally. I only saw one guy with a medic rebel outfit, but that guy wasn't doing shit at all medically. He was just there to lie about the situation, and profited.

I commented on the shot mid-typing situation, and I belivee it might have been an in-game error.

And also, an allegedly copy paste /me. It's possible to write it all that quickly.
 
This rule is iffy. I'm pretty sure it's worded weirdly with how Reece put it. The "or" is there for a reason. You can either kill them by taking them out of medical reach, so that they bleed out, or by roleplaying an execution.
Would be valid if it met the requirments for such. The RP provided was sub-standard and does not meet the requirments.
 
Would be valid if it met the requirments for such. The RP provided was sub-standard and does not meet the requirments.
It was acceptable, as stated by Reece. More than acceptable, in-fact, "despite personal beliefs". I don't know how to put this without sounding rude, but what you think doesn't matter, at least thaẗ́'s what I took from Reece's message. The rules matter.
 
I didn't see any doctors personally. I only saw one guy with a medic rebel outfit, but that guy wasn't doing shit at all medically. He was just there to lie about the situation, and profited.

I commented on the shot mid-typing situation, and I belivee it might have been an in-game error.

And also, an allegedly copy paste /me. It's possible to write it all that quickly.
Glitches are still a fair reason for a PK appeal. The fact that someone had an issue resulting in their death should not be an excuse to validate the death. It's the opposite.
 
Such a weird hill to die on ngl.
Server's ending soon, and all the people against Omni are all friends of Marco from what I've seen. I'm not against either, but the rules state that Omni hasn't done anything wrong.
 
Glitches are still a fair reason for a PK appeal. The fact that someone had an issue resulting in their death should not be an excuse to validate the death. It's the opposite.
Yet the PK appeal would have to void the entire situation. Which is fine by me. Yes, I'm saying this cause of the aftermath lol. It's petty, but there's no other realistic way. She was riddled with bullets to the head.
 
i'll be sure to keep ready execution messages on hands so i can "type them fast" if ever I have to kil lsomeone then, or shoot someone mid typing yadda yadda...again

Weird hill to die on dude, v2 ending doesn't mean shit can't be done wrong or fucked up.
 
i'll be sure to keep ready execution messages on hands so i can "type them fast" if ever I have to kil lsomeone then, or shoot someone mid typing yadda yadda...again

Weird hill to die on dude, v2 ending doesn't mean shit can't be done wrong or fucked up.
Which isn't what I'm saying. I'm saying that all of this won't matter in the end. You die today, or you die tomorrow. The PK appeal can't be accepted without it being void, as it'd be blatantly avoiding injury RP.
 
Previous circumstances of which I engaged with omnipresent have already soured my thoughts upon their consistency and continuity. They have a play to win mindset; and while the speed and S2K leaves rooms for errors, the PK was too rushed, and the execution was *being stopped* by someone else, who *pointed* a weapon at omnipotent's character, as seen here.

1764072830976.png


Not to mention; I was in an active roleplay scenario, with you, Ozymandias; and it should've stayed a roleplay scenario.

Mind you, I could've killed, and PK'd omnipotent at previous instances, and it seems like the bad-faith is at his end.

Unlike Omnipotent, of which his character could've been killed twice over by mine (When I first S2K'd him, and he, as RAD-X accused me of, 'shouted into the radio' [even when he was meant to be unconscious, to get back up to come help him.]), and when I decided to enter into S2RP with him (instead of just shooting his character). In that situation where purple knight's vort character was bombed by omnipotent.

I'd also like to think that S2RP situation was [in my humble opinion] rigged by rabithunter's GMing(which i begrudingly complied by), who, after I won a guns roll, against his injured, limping character, decided I'd miss all of my shots-- and let them move to cover, without everyone else having an action of their own. Though, that's tangential and off-topic. Anyways,

Doctor, (Ahab), changed his nickname and description to presumably ellude capture or anyone from recognising him, and after I pointed this out to @fhs15 (richard johnson), and ahab was promptly arrested, he was let out, to what I assume is classic miscommunication.


From my perspective, omnipotent has consistently shown bad-faith over the course of this roleplay arc; deciding to not roleplay, and instead, S2K due to it's simplicity.

I have repeatedly tried to create roleplay for this bunker via tribunals & tension, which has worked, and this S2K does not provide roleplay except for people to react into that which is lost.

My character has socially manipulated Judge's standing within the rebel community to get him charged with penal labour, laying against him a series of hearsay charges using the neo-protectorates influence and eyewitnesses from other shenanigans they've commited.

The last few paragraphs is to say, yes, the PK auth is valid; that was not the argument, that doesn't mean this PK in itself is valid, and nor should the health of the community be damaged by such negative roleplay and hasteful decisions. @nath1234567 slayed me first, which, I think was an error, considering help was five seconds away; and already present, before the execution /me.

This entire situation is because I decided to roleplay with a low-reputation person, and that person did indeed live up to their low-reputation.

Anyways.

The execution /me wouldn't have been able to be carried out, given it was active S2K, and my character would not have been shot in the head; and I would be able to roleplay once more, with people that prefer roleplay: such as @dubik15 or the renowned slum doctor nerd @tsaoT

So, were my PK appeal to be re-discussed, I'd rather have the capability to roleplay the consequences of the assassination attempt, as, in accordance with execution rules, the execution /me is not valid.
 
The server almost being over is just more reason to not let a character die to rulebreaks and poor RP.
 
Even the liberators performed better /mes in their executions

View attachment 49953View attachment 49952View attachment 49950
This is just clear bias, and is not a valid argument. Emotions can affect you, and this is clearly just you lashing out at your friend dying. "Even the liberators performed better /mes in their executions"

- Clear grammar difference. Ahab's being better.
- Liberators was one was obviously rushed.
- If you remove the quote from the Liberator's /me, this is literally just a half-baked rushed dogshit /me. "Pulls down the trigger aiming at the CCA blowing the head of the man all while saying"
 
The server almost being over is just more reason to not let a character die to rulebreaks and poor RP.
As stated by Reece, there were no rulebreaks present despite personal beliefs. This isn't my opinion, but you can think there was a rulebreak, but objectively, there was not. All was roleplayed fairly according to Reece.
 
This whole situation seems like another low-quality shot-cop situation where someone wanted to kill cops "Becuase they're evil." and that's it. Boring roleplay unsatisfiying ending to the story, really people. Its the end of the server, you wanted to s2k at the end? Boring.

Hope whoever did this isn't invited to v3
 
This whole situation seems like another low-quality shot-cop situation where someone wanted to kill cops "Becuase they're evil." and that's it. Boring roleplay unsatisfiying ending to the story, really people. Its the end of the server, you wanted to s2k at the end? Boring.
Saying "because they're evil" is an understatement. There's more to it. RAD-X let the guy S2K, and he took the chance that he got. Irida is objectively an evil piece of shit, and definitely deserved to die. (Don't take this the wrong way Marco love you homie.) along with Iroquois, and Ahab.

Irida was a former officer who had oppressed citizens, beat and probably even tortured them for personal gain. There's also the fact that Irida jumped straight to conclusions without any facts, along with Eden and the guy playing the black medic. Dude just straight up lied in-RP to make the situation sound worse.
 
The PK team, is, at this time reviewing the PK appeal once more; given a majority of what RAD-X said is proven to be completely false as I have proven through my videos.

As stated by Reece, there were no rulebreaks present despite personal beliefs. This isn't my opinion, but you can think there was a rulebreak, but objectively, there was not. All was roleplayed fairly according to Reece.
 
Saying "because they're evil" is an understatement. There's more to it. RAD-X let the guy S2K, and he took the chance that he got. Irida is objectively an evil piece of shit, and definitely deserved to die. (Don't take this the wrong way Marco love you homie.) along with Iroquois, and Ahab.

Irida was a former officer who had oppressed citizens, beat and probably even tortured them for personal gain. There's also the fact that Irida jumped straight to conclusions without any facts, along with Eden and the guy playing the black medic. Dude just straight up lied in-RP to make the situation sound worse.
With all due respect. The entire bunkers sentiment towards cops has NOT been this way, and the two people who were this way attempted to kill cops, then fled into outlands for 2 days and did not log on after being chased out by a swarm of people after killing / hurting the cops the first time, then they waited OOC for heat to die down before coming back again and finishing the job, seems played out and stupid.

I Hope you both feel bad for this increddibly stupid ending too the server, all you've done by doing this is leave it with lots of bad feelings for people. Good job.
 
This is just clear bias, and is not a valid argument. Emotions can affect you, and this is clearly just you lashing out at your friend dying. "Even the liberators performed better /mes in their executions"

- Clear grammar difference. Ahab's being better.
- Liberators was one was obviously rushed.
- If you remove the quote from the Liberator's /me, this is literally just a half-baked rushed dogshit /me. "Pulls down the trigger aiming at the CCA blowing the head of the man all while saying"
First of all, Ad Hominem is not a valid argument. Second I'd like to point out that the roleplay done to execute this character is done in the same timespan as the one by the liberators. I am not stating that they are "Literally the same" since the situations that led up where vastly different, however I am pointing out that the same "rushed" RP can be seen in both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top