Restrict /act to the active shooter in tbc

[Taliazure]

As explained in the title it seems that people have been abusing the /acts mid gunfight to escape bullets and make themselves more hidden behind objects.
TO avoid the exploration of these perhaps this could simply be only allowed to those who are in their active turn like the radios otherwise you will not be able to do an act if you are not in your turn.

 

[Fallizs]

I ain't ever seen this bro you literally just gave me the best ideas ever tysm

 

[HOKI]

Why?

 

[Fallizs]

Why?

exactly, cos like if you in a battle irl and i was in tbc against the police i am doing /actinjured all the time to dodge them bullets hell nah cuz

 

[TheGoodHunter]

We've had a huge issue with this in a recent firefight between three factions and the animations were abused in order to prevent being damaged during a gunfight. Currently, my standpoint is the same as you and I wish for this to be implemented so staff won't have to ban/PK people who do it.

 

[Omega]

On God

 

[June]

We've had a huge issue with this in a recent firefight between three factions and the animations were abused in order to prevent being damaged during a gunfight. Currently, my standpoint is the same as you and I wish for this to be implemented so staff won't have to ban/PK people who do it.

I was not aware of any firefight, do you have a video of it?

 

[RedHotGinger]

Seems easier to just ban the morons who exploit in my opinion.

 

[June]

Seems easier to just ban the morons who exploit in my opinion.

yeah just ban half your player base, we've already banned one half so lets just ban the rest while we are at it instead of fixing the broken garbage tbc system no one likes.

 

[Fallizs]

tbc is dog why dont we just have s2k for once please i beg

 

[TheGoodHunter]

I was not aware of any firefight, do you have a video of it?

It was an event made by the Creative Team between three factions: CWU/ICU, Combine, and Rebels. The rebels involved ended up snitching about the script of the event and amassed a large group of rebels, particularly 13-14 troopers, before ambushing the CWU/Combine and proceeding to literally kill everyone involved.

Some, if not most, had abused the /actinjured animation to prevent themselves from taking damage during the firefight itself. Said individuals have been banned as said by Goose in the general discussion channel for doing so. I will be showcasing an image of those who were involved in the fight to show how many were truly involved, however I will be blurring their rp names to prevent metagaming.

 

[June]

It was an event made by the Creative Team between three factions: CWU/ICU, Combine, and Rebels. The rebels involved ended up snitching about the script of the event and amassed a large group of rebels, particularly 13-14 troopers, before ambushing the CWU/Combine and proceeding to literally kill everyone involved.

Some, if not most, had abused the /actinjured animation to prevent themselves from taking damage during the firefight itself. Said individuals have been banned as said by Goose in the general discussion channel for doing so. I will be showcasing an image of those who were involved in the fight to show how many were truly involved, however I will be blurring their rp names to prevent metagaming.

LOL
The absolute state of willard networks rp

 

[Nezoose]

yeah just ban half your player base, we've already banned one half so lets just ban the rest while we are at it instead of fixing the broken garbage tbc system no one likes.

are u okay

 

[RedHotGinger]

yeah just ban half your player base, we've already banned one half so lets just ban the rest while we are at it instead of fixing the broken garbage tbc system no one likes.

Better to have 10 players that don't cheat than 30 that do.

 

[June]

Better to have 10 players that don't cheat than 30 that do.

Lets be honest here, most of us (not me of course!) have esp enabled by default so there is no shame in it. Banning the playerbase is bad

 

[Omega]

Seems easier to just ban the morons who exploit in my opinion.

Just removing it entirely would get rid of the ability to exploit, even if someone does it on accident.

I’ve thought of a scenario where I can see someone genuinely having their best intentions with it, where without thinking, they do a /actinjured after they’re shot to RP, however they stay down through their turn and such.

 

[June]

Just removing it entirely would get rid of the ability to exploit, even if someone does it on accident.

I’ve thought of a scenario where I can see someone genuinely having their best intentions with it, where without thinking, they do a /actinjured after they’re shot to RP, however they stay down through their turn and such.

If I was a civilian caught in a firefight the first thing I'd do is /actinjured so I can look like I'm on the ground cowering. But I'd get banned for doing so?
This needs to be fixed

 

[Omega]

If I was a civilian caught in a firefight the first thing I'd do is /actinjured so I can look like I'm on the ground cowering. But I'd get banned for doing so?
This needs to be fixed

Rare time June and I agree with each other.

 

[Aspect™]

This sounds like something that can be resolved with a simple staff request of punishing the exploiters. I'd rather not restrict this as it may come in handy in some situations.

Denied.
For now.