Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Search results

  1. L

    This is just ridiculous now.

    Correct. As for "abusing character swap", LTARP through character swap is quite literally that. I'm going to have to ask you to begin phrasing your responses more carefully- and perhaps in one post.
  2. L

    This is just ridiculous now.

    There are no hidden bases. If you didn't know, we would have known this from observing- but you did know. You should not be flagging off to avoid the sweep, nor does it nullify it because you're already wanted. If other people have done so, then they're equally at odds with the rules.
  3. L

    This is just ridiculous now.

    Please explain to me how I am changing the definition of the rules. You swapped character to avoid a sweep when you had contraband on your character. As I have explained, that is LTARP.
  4. L

    This is just ridiculous now.

    Just to be clear, if you're caught in the middle of the slums with contraband on you, regardless of if you are the 'target' of the sweep or not, I definitely consider that to be a case of LTARP. There is no longer any distinction in the rules between 'retaliatory sweeps' and 'shadow sweeps'. if...
  5. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    This still proves that you had made use of that pipe revolver even after being told to not make use of it- and that you had been using that container to access items from Cody Stanford on a different character anyways prior to even having asked- over a month before, in fact. After discussion...
  6. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    I wouldn't be bringing it up if it was on KING-9.
  7. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    I also have logs of you with another weapon. You put it into the container on Cody Stanford on May 26th. You then went to it on June 23rd, took it out, and put it back in. You came back to it on July 24th, and continued to keep on making use of it through the full day up to the 25th. This also...
  8. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    It's impossible for this to be the case. You last interacted with the Makarov on KING-9 on the 7th of June. You then interacted with it on another character on the 23rd of June. And then with an entirely different character, interacted with it on the 17th of July. There is obviously a large gap...
  9. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    Right- my concern is that there's a log of you accessing it with another character once, which would fit into your story of having made a mistake with it. But that doesn't explain another log nearly a month apart of you then accessing the same container with another character. Is there anything...
  10. L

    Stanford's Ban Appeal - 76561198043970173

    When was the instance of you thinking you could change ownership of your donator container?
  11. L

    Soda's Ban Appeal

    Hi Soda, I'm going to be passing this appeal along to @Imperator RAD-X , who has a more detailed understanding of the situation. He is currently moving at the minute, so it may be a while before he responds.
  12. L

    Poloo's Discord Ban Appeal

    Hi Poloo, Apologies for your wait. After discussion among our staff team and in light of your previous behaviour on the Discord, including but not limited to the image posted, we have elected to deny this appeal.
  13. L

    Swoots Unban Appeal - HL2RP

    Hi, Apologies for the wait. After some discussion among our staff team in regards to your exploiting, and your behaviour in previous appeals, we have chosen to deny this appeal. Please feel free to apply again in a month.
  14. L

    ceras - ban appeal - 76561198196597441

    I have full trust in Gr4ss' ability to vet and conclude who is responsible with the use of the logging tools at his disposal. This seems to be a clear cut case, and I see no reason to believe that this was somebody else based on the evidence he has given. This appeal is denied. Contact Atle if...
  15. L

    please unban me appeal - 76561199111013482

    As per my previous, this is denied.
  16. L

    On Civil Protection Leadership & The Ideology of Edgelordism

    I mean- they sought us out for the CMB frequency. We didn't go to them. As for not hearing the command to stop- it was a voice command, too, so it definitely would have been audible to you.
  17. L

    On Civil Protection Leadership & The Ideology of Edgelordism

    This person wasn't a stranger to Gomez. They'd already met before, and had discussed the work that Kuskova and Jost would be conducting- though the MCP took a poor view of it when it came to them mentioning things such as 'getting officers to move the furniture slightly out of place in somebodys...
  18. L

    On Civil Protection Leadership & The Ideology of Edgelordism

    The Overseer who handled the situation (Wittrow) is generally the worst Overseer to have handle this. He is a complete and utter sadist and a bully. That's how his character always has been- he abuses his power. I believe the general reason that the Overseer was brought in was due to Mulligan...
  19. L

    On Civil Protection Leadership & The Ideology of Edgelordism

    Stone, you were banned for toxicity because you constantly leapt into LOOC to insult people. I haven't even spoken to you at all since your ban and (seemingly false) apology. You immediately accuse me of gaslighting people when I post a response that isn't even directed to you, and then tell me...
  20. L

    On Civil Protection Leadership & The Ideology of Edgelordism

    I honestly can't help you out here, Stone. You accuse anything I say as being gaslighting. There's nothing more I can do for you, buddy.
Back
Top